← All disputations

Disputation XXIX

On the Angels, in General and in Particular

De Angelis in genere et in specie

Draft. This translation has not had its final review. The Latin is the 1615 collected reprint, not yet collated against the original separate printing, so quote it with care.
PresidingJacobus Arminius
RespondentAndreas Knutius Vesalius
Date1605-03-30
Text printed fromSyntagma disputationum theologicarum ... quarto repetitarum (Rotterdam: Joannes Leonardi à Berewout, 1615), pp. 98–108
WitnessCollected 1615 reprint. Stanglin XXIX is edited from the separate 1605 quarto (Trinity College Dublin BB.ii.15 no. 9), NOT collated here.
Headnote

Occasion. The eighth disputation of the fourth Leiden cycle, defended 30 March 1605 under Arminius by Andreas Knutius of Wesel. It follows directly on the disputation De creatione mundi and opens the treatment of the world's rational inhabitants, angels before men.

Authorship. By the convention of the Leiden faculty the theses are the presiding professor's; the student defended them. Stanglin argues the case for Arminius's authorship of the disputations at length, and it is his argument, not ours.

The doctrinal move. Arminius builds the whole doctrine out of a single definition — angels are spirits subsisting in themselves, finite, rational, immortal, created to praise God and serve him in the government of the world — and then unfolds it term by term, so that every later claim is answerable to the definition rather than to authority or speculation. The polemical edge is directed twice: against those who reduce angels to good or bad motions of the soul, and against the scholastic hierarchies, which he sets aside in a sentence.

Where it is answered. Nowhere directly; the topic was not contested between him and Gomarus. Its interest is methodological — it shows Arminius doing ordinary Reformed scholastic work on an uncontroversial locus, which is precisely the context the polemical disputations lack.

Thesis I

Latin

Angeli nomen non naturam ipsorum, sed officium significat, quod verbo מלאך et ἄγγελος designatur, atque in hac significatione accipimus in praesentiarum vocabulum Angeli.

Marg. Mal. 2:7 · Apoc. 2:1 · Heb. 1:14

English

The name angel signifies not their nature but their office, which is denoted by the word מלאך and by ἄγγελος; and it is in this sense that we here take the word angel.

The opening is a definition-by-etymology and it governs everything after it: because the name is functional, the nature has to be established separately, which is what Theses III–XIII do.

Thesis II

Latin

Nomina Angelorum omnia fermè desumuntur, aut ab essentia ipsorum et natura, aut à virtute dignitate et potentia, aut ab officio atque operatione. Ab essentia dicuntur spiritus, Graecis et Latinis, Hebraeis רוחות. À virtute dignitate et potentia dicuntur filii Dei, et dii, archangeli, item throni; et Satan dicitur deus huius saeculi. Ab officio et operatione מלאכים, item λειτουργικὰ πνεύματα.

English

Nearly all the names of the angels are drawn either from their essence and nature, or from their power, dignity and might, or from their office and operation. From their essence they are called spirits, in Greek and Latin, and in Hebrew רוחות. From power, dignity and might they are called sons of God, and gods, archangels, and likewise thrones; and Satan is called the god of this world. From office and operation they are called מלאכים, and likewise ministering spirits (λειτουργικὰ πνεύματα).

Thesis III

Latin

Sunt autem Angeli spiritus per se subsistentes, finiti, rationales et immortales, ad hunc finem creati ut eum laudarent, illorumque ministerio in gubernando mundo uteretur: quam descriptionem per partes diducimus.

English

Angels, then, are spirits subsisting in themselves, finite, rational, and immortal, created to this end, that they should praise him and that he should use their ministry in governing the world — a description which we now unfold part by part.

This is the hinge of the disputation. Theses IV–XIII take up its terms in order: spirits (IV), subsisting in themselves (V), created (VI–VII), finite (VIII–IX), rational (X–XII), immortal (XIII), and the end of their creation (XIV).

Thesis IV

Latin

Primò dicimus esse spiritus, quia sunt naturae merè spiritualis, materiae corporeae expertes, et sanè sub eodem genere proximo continentur cum anima nostra, extra controversiam est, quae incorporea et invisibilis. Deo comparati Angeli nomine non sunt prorsus spiritus simplices: constant enim ex actu, quo sunt, et potentia, qua immutari possunt, respectu virtutis Dei infinitae, à quo illorum vita et esse dependent.

English

First we say they are spirits, because they are of a merely spiritual nature, without corporeal matter, and indeed are contained under the same proximate genus as our soul, which is beyond controversy incorporeal and invisible. Compared with God, however, angels are not simple spirits in the full sense: for they are composed of the act by which they are and the potency by which they can be changed, in respect of the infinite power of God, on which their life and being depend.

Thesis V

Latin

Secundò asserimus illos per se subsistere, ut significetur illos esse vera ὑφισταμένας, quod olim Sadducaei cum errore negarunt, et hodie à quibusdam recantatum, contendentibus nihil aliud esse, quàm bonos pravosve animorum motus; sed contradicente S. Scriptura, et ratione manifestè reclamante: angelis enim tribuitur intelligentia et voluntas libera; adhaec varii affectus et effectus seu actiones, quae sunt suppositorum.

English

Secondly we assert that they subsist in themselves, meaning that they are true subsistences (ὑφισταμένας) — which the Sadducees once erroneously denied, and which is repeated today by certain men who contend that angels are nothing other than good or bad motions of the soul. But Holy Scripture contradicts this, and reason plainly cries out against it: for understanding and free will are attributed to angels, and along with these various affections and effects or actions, which belong to individual subjects.

Thesis VI

Latin

Tertiò creatos in initio rerum omnium cum coelo eorum domicilio, non ab aeterno, aut ante mundi principium: quod ex quibusdam S. Scripturae locis, necsub obscura, nec infirma ratione colligitur: imò quicquid est praeter creatorem, est creatum. De tempore, quo creati sint, disceptatur. Certum est iam id extitisse quàm Deus terram fundaret, cum tunc iubilasse dicantur. Verò simile est cum coelo eorum domicilio creatos esse.

Marg. Gen. 8:44 (?) · Psal. 148 · Job 38:7

English

Thirdly, that they were created, at the beginning of all things, together with heaven their dwelling — not from eternity, nor before the beginning of the world. This is gathered from certain places of Scripture on grounds neither obscure nor weak; indeed whatever is besides the Creator is created. The time at which they were created is disputed. It is certain that they already existed when God laid the foundation of the earth, since they are then said to have shouted for joy. It is likely that they were created together with heaven, their dwelling.

Thesis VII

Latin

Caeteri creati sunt omnes ex aequo boni, et quidem ad imaginem Dei non minùs quàm homines, licet praestantiore modo: eoque filii Dei dicuntur. Haec imago consistebat in integritate et sanctitate. Integritas ista quamvis summa, secundùm rationem creationis tamen et naturae fuit mutabilis. Consistebat verò cum in facultatibus naturae omnibus, tum in actionibus ipsorum, quae est in obedientia voluntatis Dei. Obedientia ista est cum in iustitia, tum in singularium officiorum executione. Sanctitas consistebat in veracitate et humilitate. Integritatis et sanctitatis comes felicitas, conveniente imagini Dei ad quam erant conditi.

English

The rest were all created equally good, and indeed in the image of God no less than men, though in a more excellent manner; and for that reason they are called sons of God. This image consisted in integrity and holiness. That integrity, however complete, was nevertheless mutable by the very account of creation and of nature. It consisted both in all the faculties of their nature and in their actions, which lies in obedience to the will of God. That obedience consists both in righteousness and in the carrying out of particular duties. Holiness consisted in truthfulness and humility. The companion of integrity and holiness was felicity, answering to the image of God according to which they were made.

Thesis VIII

Latin

Quartò finitos dicimus, quia creati est determinari à creante. Ac quia sunt spiritus finiti, metimur eos loco, tempore et numero. Loco, non quod in loco sint per contactum, aut secundùm quantitatem dimensivam: sed οὐσιωδῶς, hoc est existant in loco, sine ullius spatii localis occupatione aut repletione. Adhaec S. Literae ita de descensu, ascensu, volatuque Angelorum loquuntur, ut apertum iis tribuant motum è loco ad locum per spatia locorum, unde consequitur eos per se localiter moveri. Motus autem corporis vel subtilis, vel crassi, non tamen in momento, sed in tempore, quia in motu Angelorum datur successio, cum simul in multis locis esse non possint. Quare non sine tempore moventur, licet vix perceptibili, haec causa quod propter motus celeritatem ventis comparentur, et alae ipsis attribuantur in Scripturis.

Marg. Dan. 13:20 (?)

English

Fourthly we call them finite, because to be created is to be determined by the one creating. And because they are finite spirits, we measure them by place, time and number. By place — not that they are in a place by contact or according to dimensive quantity, but substantially (οὐσιωδῶς), that is, they exist in a place without occupying or filling any local space. Moreover, Holy Scripture speaks of the descent, ascent and flight of angels in such a way as plainly to attribute to them motion from place to place across the intervals of places, from which it follows that they are moved locally in themselves. Their motion, however, is not that of a body whether subtle or gross; and it takes place not in an instant but in time, because in the motion of angels there is succession, since they cannot be in many places at once. Therefore they are not moved without time, though the time be scarcely perceptible; and this is why, on account of the swiftness of their motion, they are compared to the winds, and wings are attributed to them in the Scriptures.

Thesis IX

Latin

Numero finiti sunt, qui caeteroquin longè maximus est, nobis incognitus; Deo notus, qui omnes in numerato habet. Porrò tot numero primùm à Deo sunt conditi, non generatione aliorum ex aliis multiplicati, suntque omnes unius eiusdemque speciei, differunt solùm qualitatibus et officiis. Ordinem esse aliquem inter angelos è scripturis manifestum, qui non tam oritur à natura Angelorum dignitate et excellentia, quàm à diversis obeundis officiis, ad quae pro arbitratu Dei adhibentur. Quae verò Scholastici curiosè et ficticiè disserunt de Hierarchiis et hierarchiarum gradibus, illa cum S. Scriptura nos scire nolit, libenter ignoramus.

Marg. Dan. 7:10 · Mat. 26:53

English

They are finite in number — a number otherwise very great, unknown to us but known to God, who holds them all in his reckoning. Further, they were created by God in that number at the first, not multiplied by the generation of some from others; and they are all of one and the same species, differing only in qualities and offices. That there is some order among the angels is plain from the Scriptures — an order arising not so much from the dignity and excellence of the angels' nature as from the diverse offices to be discharged, to which they are put at God's discretion. But as for what the Scholastics discuss, inquisitively and fictitiously, concerning Hierarchies and the grades of hierarchies — since Holy Scripture does not wish us to know these things, we gladly remain ignorant of them.

The sentence that most repays attention in the whole disputation. It is a methodological declaration, not a throwaway: the limit of Scripture is the limit of the doctrine, and the Dionysian hierarchies fall outside it. This is Reformed method operating exactly as Gomarus would have operated it.

Thesis X

Latin

Rationales insuper affirmamus esse Angelos, hoc est, mente et ratione praeditos ad cognoscendum Deum et quae Dei sunt. Intelligunt quod sui obiectum et maiora quàm homines, non tamen omnia: nec notitiam universalem, sed etiam singula entium creatorum genera, quin etiam singula eorum individua, non tamen singulas singulorum hominum actiones, multò minùs animorum cogitationes explorata habent, nisi externo indicio sensus, vel motus, vel vocis exprimantur, vel ipsis à Deo revelentur. Quod ad intellectus ipsorum simplex est et spiritualis, ita et modus intelligendi simplex et spiritualis, licet non citra discursum existat. Saepe enim nova quae priùs ignorarunt, addiscunt partim per revelationem Dei, partim per experientiam, partim per coniecturam.

Marg. 2 Sam. 14:17 · Mar. 13:32

English

We affirm further that angels are rational, that is, endowed with mind and reason for knowing God and the things of God. They understand what is their object, and greater things than men do, yet not all things; nor have they universal knowledge, but they have explored the several genera of created beings, and even their several individuals — yet not the several actions of individual men, and much less the thoughts of their minds, unless these are expressed by some outward indication of sense, or motion, or voice, or are revealed to them by God. And as their understanding is simple and spiritual, so also their manner of understanding is simple and spiritual, though it does not exist without discursive reasoning. For they often learn new things, which they did not know before, partly by God's revelation, partly by experience, partly by conjecture.

Thesis XI

Latin

Intellectum subsequitur voluntas, quam Angelis tribui necesse est ut intellectu praeditis, et intellectu bonum apprehendentibus: quin et liberum arbitrium, quo liberè eligant et repudient, quod eligendum vel repudiandum oblatum est, sive bonum, sive malum.

English

Upon understanding there follows will, which must be attributed to angels as endowed with understanding and as apprehending the good by understanding; and indeed free choice, by which they freely choose and refuse whatever is set before them to be chosen or refused, whether good or evil.

Note the plain ascription of liberum arbitrium to the angels, argued from the structure of intellect and will rather than from any contested premise. On the angelic case Arminius's Reformed colleagues would not have differed; the interest lies in seeing the same faculty-psychology he applies to the human case operating here without controversy.

Thesis XII

Latin

Utriusque cum intellectûs tum voluntatis commune instrumentum est potentia, quae est vis agendi extra se. Haec in iis maxima quidem est, finita tamen: unde Psal. 103. dicuntur valentissimi robore; et 2 Thess. 1:7 angeli potentiae Dei. Hinc fiunt actiones, in quibus sunt solertissimi et expeditissimi, quas sapientiùs, liberiùs, celeriùsque efficiunt quàm nos.

English

The common instrument of both understanding and will is power, which is the force of acting outside oneself. In them this is very great indeed, yet finite: whence in Psalm 103 they are called mighty in strength, and in 2 Thessalonians 1:7 the angels of God's power. From this proceed their actions, in which they are most skilful and most expeditious, and which they perform more wisely, more freely and more swiftly than we do.

Thesis XIII

Latin

Denique immortales praedicamus, hoc est vitae aeternùm duraturae. Si tamen potentiam Dei ad infinitam species: facile est ea in nihilum redigi possent, prout ab eadem ex nihilo conditi, imò ultrò in nihilum relaberentur, si divinae conservationis sustentari desinant.

English

Finally we declare them immortal, that is, of a life that will endure for ever. Yet if you look to the infinite power of God, they could easily be reduced to nothing, inasmuch as by that same power they were made from nothing; indeed they would of themselves slip back into nothing, should they cease to be upheld by the divine preservation.

Thesis XIV

Latin

Finis creationis Angelorum subnectitur, qui ‹…› eorum respicit, quod eorum opera Deus utatur in gubernatione mundi. Aspectabilibus ideo corporibus induuntur ad tempus, quoties à Deo in terram amandantur, ut iis utantur in suis ad homines legationibus, quas ut ministerio peracto rursus eadem deponunt. Caeterùm corpora assumunt aut re, aut specie: specie, ut in visionibus plerunque et insomniis; et in corporibus quae functiones demandatas obire non poterant.

English

The end of the creation of the angels is next appended, which ‹…› regards them in this, that God uses their work in the government of the world. For this reason they are clothed for a time with visible bodies, whenever they are sent by God down to earth, so as to use them in their embassies to men — bodies which, the ministry once performed, they again lay aside. Moreover they assume bodies either in reality or in appearance: in appearance, as generally in visions and dreams, and in bodies which could not discharge the functions committed to them.

Thesis XV

Latin

De Angelorum natura in genere thesibus praecedentibus egimus, quae semper eadem post lapsum remansit: sequitur illorum distinctio in bonos et malos. Angelorum igitur alii praestiterunt Deo obedientiam debitam, alii nequiter et foedè ab eo desciverunt. Quae distinctio licèt in ipsorum creatione minimè fundetur, nititur tamen iis S. Scripturae fulcris quae docent quosdam originem suam ‹deseruisse›, nec in veritate perstitisse: unde evincitur, initio bonos fuisse creatos.

Marg. Joh. 8:44

English

In the preceding theses we have treated of the nature of angels in general, which remained always the same after the fall. There follows their division into good and evil. Some of the angels, then, rendered God the obedience due to him; others wickedly and foully revolted from him. Although this division is in no way founded in their creation, it nevertheless rests on those supports of Holy Scripture which teach that certain of them ‹abandoned› their origin and did not stand fast in the truth — from which it is established that they were created good in the beginning.

Thesis XVI

Latin

Qui Deo obedierunt, ‹…› dicuntur boni angeli, quorum officium consideratur tum respectu Dei, tum Christi, tum hominum. Officium respectu Dei est, quod continuò celebrant nomen Dei: sic passim in Apocalypsi introducuntur Angeli Deum celebrantes; tum executio mandatorum eius, sunt enim ministri.

English

Those who obeyed God are called ‹…› good angels, whose office is considered in respect of God, of Christ, and of men. Their office in respect of God is that they continually celebrate the name of God — so throughout the Apocalypse angels are brought in celebrating God — and further the carrying out of his commands, for they are ministers.

Thesis XVII

Latin

Officium respectu hominum est, vel circa bonos et electos, vel circa malos. Electos quod attinet, ‹…› docent plurimum ista Scripturae, Angelos nempe divinae erga eos beneficentiae dispensatores esse et administros; ideoque commemorat pro salute nostra excubare, etc. Quod ad impios attinet, officium eorum occupatur in punitione, vel saltem inhibitione malorum, quae ipsis impendantur. Pro certo autem asserimus non posse ordinariè cuique electo bonum quendam angelum à Deo designatum esse; hoc quidem certius est, simul eos ad electorum salutem et incolumitatem conspirare, ac interdum certum quendam ad pios liberandos custodiendosque ablegari.

English

Their office in respect of men concerns either the good and elect, or the evil. As regards the elect, those places of Scripture teach abundantly ‹…› that the angels are dispensers and administrators of the divine beneficence toward them; and so it records that they keep watch for our salvation, and the like. As regards the ungodly, their office is occupied in punishing, or at least in restraining, the evils that threaten them. But we assert for certain that it cannot be held that ordinarily some particular good angel is assigned by God to each elect person. This indeed is more certain: that they conspire together for the salvation and safety of the elect, and that from time to time a particular one is dispatched to deliver and guard the godly.

The denial of an individually assigned guardian angel is the disputation's one substantive negative thesis about the good angels, and it is characteristic: the doctrine is allowed to go exactly as far as the text warrants and is then stopped, with the weaker claim ("this is more certain") substituted for the popular stronger one.

Thesis XVIII

Latin

Ex his elicitur quae bonorum Angelorum sit potentia, magna quidem illa, ‹…› cum sit essentia finita, in rebus naturalibus ‹…›.

English

From these things is gathered what the power of the good angels is: great indeed, ‹…› since their essence is finite, in natural things ‹…›.

This thesis is substantially obscured in the copy by contemporary manuscript underlining and ink; only the frame of the argument is legible. It must be recovered from a second witness before publication.

Thesis XIX

Latin

‹…› universi natura et virium excedat. Aliter gradum potentiae occupant circa diabolos ‹…› nostros, quos variè afficere possunt. Constat etiam bonos Angelos vires diabolis superare, ex eo quòd mali passim vinci et vinciri dicantur à bonis Angelis. Numerus horum magnus est, neque tamen infinitus.

Marg. Col. 2:18 (?) · Apoc. 19:10 · Apoc. 22:8

English

‹…› exceeds the nature and powers of the universe. They hold a different degree of power in regard to the devils ‹…› ours, whom they can affect in various ways. It is also established that the good angels surpass the devils in strength, from the fact that the evil are everywhere said to be overcome and bound by the good angels. Their number is great, yet not infinite.

Thesis XX

Latin

Caeterùm pro ratione naturae, status et gloriae debetur illis suus honos, temperatus tamen ad naturae modum, qui si violetur, exsurgit idololatria. Honorandi sunt ergo propter imitationem, non adorandi propter religionem; charitate prosequendi, non servitute. Optare nobis possumus illorum praesentiam et auxilium, minimè verò ab iis implorare.

English

For the rest, according to the measure of their nature, condition and glory, their own honour is due to them — tempered, however, to the measure of their nature; and if that measure is violated, idolatry arises. They are therefore to be honoured for imitation, not adored out of religion; to be followed with charity, not with servitude. We may wish for their presence and help, but by no means implore it of them.

The anti-Roman point, made structurally rather than polemically: the honour due follows from the nature, and worship exceeds the nature. Compare the argument of Public Disputation XXIV, De invocatione sanctorum, which applies the identical move to the saints.

Thesis XXI

Latin

Tantùm de Bonis Angelis: sequuntur Mali Angeli. Horum si naturam consideres, eandem cum bonis obtinent: sunt enim spiritus intelligentes ac potentes, qualitatibus duntaxat à bonis discrepantes. Ea de causa appellantur mali angeli, daemones et spiritus impuri, quia non servarunt suam originem. Dicitur autem diabolus à principio peccare, eo quòd sub primum modum initium sit praevaricandi ipse, et homini autor fuerit praevaricationis.

Marg. Joh. 8:44 · Jud. v. 6 · 2 Pet. 2:4 · 1 Joh. 3:8

English

So much for the good angels; the evil angels follow. If you consider their nature, they possess the same as the good: for they are intelligent and powerful spirits, differing from the good only in qualities. For this reason they are called evil angels, demons, and unclean spirits, because they did not keep their origin. The devil is said to sin from the beginning, because he was himself the first to transgress, and was the author of transgression to man.

Doctrinally load-bearing: the evil angels differ from the good "only in qualities," not in nature. This is the same principle Arminius applies to fallen human nature — the fall corrupts qualities, not the constitution — and it is worth marking for the reader who comes to this disputation from the predestination controversy.

Thesis XXII

Latin

Peccatum quo commisso degenerarunt Angeli hi in diabolos, in genere fuit inobedientia; in specie nihil affirmamus, quanquam superbiam fuisse arbitremur et affectatae divinitatis crimen, probabili ducti argumento, quo et hominibus primis inobedientiam suasit et persuasit Satan.

English

The sin by whose commission these angels degenerated into devils was, in general, disobedience; as to its species we affirm nothing — although we judge it to have been pride and the crime of affected divinity, led by the probable argument that it was to this same disobedience that Satan urged and persuaded the first human beings.

"In specie nihil affirmamus" is the disputation's method in miniature, and pairs with Thesis IX.

Thesis XXIII

Latin

Poena peccati istius fuit duplex: prima, eiectio ex gloria et habitatione coelesti in has inferiores mundi partes, vel in abyssum. Altera fuit ordinatio ad cruciatus aeternos suo tempore subsecuturos, sive ignem aeternum, qui paratus dicitur diabolo et angelis eius.

Marg. 2 Pet. 2:4 · Luc. 8:31 · Mat. 25:41

English

The punishment of that sin was twofold. The first was ejection from glory and from the heavenly habitation into these lower parts of the world, or into the abyss. The second was their appointment to eternal torments to follow in their own time, that is, to the eternal fire which is said to be prepared for the devil and his angels.

Thesis XXIV

Latin

Quum verò diabolus etiamnum se pro Deo venditare divinamque gloriam affectare non desinat, duobus potissimùm operibus illam sibi comparare studet, vaticiniis et miraculis. Divinat autem diabolus, vel quia longè in futurum acie mentis prospicit, ut spiritus est acer, quàm subtilissimè, sed fallaci interdum et dubia coniectura, cuius rei duo κριτήρια: falsitas oraculorum et ambiguitas; idcircò etiam responsa quae reddunt, vel aenigmatibus implicant, vel ancipitibus amphibologiis disserpunt et obscurant. Opera autem quae similitudine et concessione miracula dicuntur, fallunt re, forma et fine. Re, si attendas, daemones plerunque praestigiis utuntur; quod ad formam, ea quae diaboli efficiunt habent naturales causas licèt occultas, diabolica dexteritate plus quàm humana comportatas et concinnatas; fine denique, dùm in iis sibi propositum habent fallere.

English

But since the devil even now does not cease to vaunt himself as God and to affect the divine glory, he strives to procure it for himself chiefly by two works: prophecies and miracles. The devil divines either because, being a keen spirit, he looks far forward into the future with the edge of his mind, as subtly as may be — but with a conjecture at times deceptive and doubtful, of which there are two marks (κριτήρια): the falsity of the oracles, and their ambiguity. And for that reason the answers they give they either wrap in riddles or spread out and darken with double meanings. As for the works which are called miracles by similarity and by concession, they deceive in substance, in form, and in end. In substance, if you attend to it, the demons generally use sleights; as to form, the things the devils accomplish have natural causes, though hidden ones, assembled and fitted together with a dexterity more than human; and in end, since in them their purpose is to deceive.

FINIS

Transcription notes
  1. Long s (ſ) is silently normalised throughout; u/v and i/j are normalised to modern convention. Accents and the printer's diacritics on adverbs (primò, verò, quàm) are retained as printed, since they are the compositor's and carry no editorial weight but do mark the text's period.
  2. ‹angle brackets› mark a reading obscured in this copy — chiefly by contemporary manuscript underlining and ink annotation, heaviest on printed pp. 98, 104 and 105. Thesis XVIII is substantially lost and needs a second witness.
  3. Marginal scripture references are given as printed, per thesis, and are not harmonised to modern versification. Two are doubtful in this copy and marked (?). Cf. reference_junius-tremellius-bible.
  4. Greek and Hebrew are reproduced as printed. The Hebrew appears without vocalisation.
  5. The disputation is numbered I–XXIV in the print, and the printed sequence has no gaps.