← All disputations

Disputation XXI

On the Roman Pontiff, and the Principal Titles which are Attributed to Him

English only, for now. The translation is James Nichols’s (London, 1828), printed from his edition and checked against its pages. Arminius’s Latin, from the 1629 Opera, is still to be set beside it.
PresidingJacobus Arminius
RespondentJohn Martinius
English printed fromJames Nichols, The Works of James Arminius, vol. 2 (London: Longman, 1828), pp. 264–274
Headnote

Occasion. The twenty-first of the twenty-five Public Disputations printed in the Opera and in Nichols's English, defended under Arminius by the respondent whom Nichols prints as John Martinius. It follows the disputation on Christian Liberty and precedes the disputation on the alleged secession of the Reformed churches from the Church of Rome.

The doctrinal move. The first thesis sets out the contrast in the titles given to the Roman Pontiff: some call him the spouse, the head and the foundation of the Church, the vicar of God and Christ, and the Prince of Pastors and Bishops, while others call him the adulterer and pimp of the Church, the false prophet, its destroyer and subverter, the enemy of God and the Antichrist, and the wicked and perverse servant. The disputation sides with the second group and undertakes to prove that he is unworthy of the first (I). Theses II to VII take the honorific titles one at a time (spouse and husband, head, foundation, Vicar-General, lord of heaven and earth, Prince of Bishops). Each is described by its properties, which are said to belong to Christ alone; since the Pontiff is not Christ, the title is denied him, and at most he is allowed the lesser designations that Scripture gives to members of the Church (II–VII). The eighth thesis holds that a Pontiff who takes or accepts these titles puts himself in Christ's place, and it rejects the reply that the titles are ministerial and held under Christ (VIII). The remaining theses take the disparaging titles in turn and give reasons for each: adulterer and pimp of the Church (IX), false prophet (X), destroyer and subverter of the Church, in four respects, faith, worship, holiness and morals, and concord (XI), Antichrist and adversary of God (XII), and the wicked and perverse servant (XIII). The last thesis returns to the titles of apostle, prophet, evangelist, pastor, teacher and universal bishop, applies the passage on the foolish shepherd in Zechariah, and closes with a prayer that the Church be delivered from the frauds and tyranny of Antichrist (XIV). Two corollaries follow: that the Court of Rome be separated from the Church in which the Pontiff sits, and that the Pontiff not be acknowledged as head of the Church or Universal Bishop by any human or positive right (Corollaries).

Thesis I

English · Nichols, 1828

I. FOR MANY ages past, all who have had any knowledge of the Pope of Rome have held no low or moderate sentiments about him, but have entertained exaggerated notions about him and uttered the most lofty and excessive eulogies: This was required by that sublime degree of dignity to which he has been elevated. Yet the things which have been spoken concerning him are so diverse, as well as adverse, as to render it matter of wonder that such various and contrary judgments and eulogies, about one and the same person, can be found among men who are Christians, at least so far as their own profession is concerned. For some persons not only [ornant sed onerant] adorn, but literally load him with titles the most honourable, when they give him the appellation of the spouse, the head, the foundation of the Catholic Church, the vicar of God and Christ on earth, the absolute lord of the whole Christian world with regard to spiritual things, in temporal things likewise so far as they are ordained for spiritual things, and the Prince of Pastors and of Bishops. Others disparage him with titles quite contrary, such as, the adulterer and pimp of the Church, the false prophet, the destroyer and subverter of the Church, the enemy of God and the Antichrist, the wicked and perverse servant, who neither discharges the duties of a Bishop, nor is worthy to bear the name. Uniting ourselves with the band of those who bestow on the Roman Pontiff the epithets last cited, we assert that he is unworthy of the honourable titles which precede them, and that the latter disparaging epithets are attributed to him through his just deserts: Which we now proceed to prove in a few Theses.

Thesis II

English · Nichols, 1828

II: The SPOUSE and HUSBAND of the Church Universal is one by [singularissima] a most particular unity, otherwise the church would be an adulteress. His properties are these: He has loved the church, has exposed or given himself for her, has purchased her for himself with his own blood, has formed her of his own flesh and bones by the Spirit of regeneration, hath sanctified and cleansed her by his own blood and by his Spirit, that he might present her holy, unblamable and glorious: (Eph. v, 25–27; Acts xx, 28:) He has sealed her for an espoused wife to himself by the earnest of his Spirit, as with a nuptial ring, (2 Cor. i, 21, 22; Rom. viii, 9, 15, 16,) and imparts to her his own blessings necessary and sufficient for life and salvation: (Eph. v, 23:) To Him the church has respect, and asks, expects and receives all good things from Him alone: (Acts iv, 12; Rev. xxii, 17:) And to Him the apostles [and their successors] are preparing to "present her as a chaste virgin to one Husband." (2 Cor. xi, 2.) These properties belong to Christ alone: But the Roman Pontiff is not Christ: Therefore he is neither the spouse nor the husband of the Church Universal: Nor can any greater [propinquitas] affinity be framed between Christ, and the Roman Pontiff even when conducting himself in the best manner, than that which is signified by the word "the friend of the bridegroom," and "the brideman." (John iii, 29.)

Thesis III

English · Nichols, 1828

III. The HEAD of the church is but one; otherwise the church would be a monster.1 His properties are these: He is united to the church by the internal bond of the Spirit and of faith: (John xvii, 15–17; 1 Cor. vi, 17, 19; Eph. iii, 17:) The church is subject and subordinate to Him: (Eph. v, 24, 25:) He perfectly contains within himself all things necessary for the life and salvation of the church: He inspires life, sensation and motion into the church by the efficacy of the Spirit: (Gal. ii, 20:) He is affected with the evils which afflict the whole church and the members in general and in particular: (Heb. iv, 15:) He suffers the persecutions and afflictions which are endured by the church, feeling them as much as if they were inflicted on his own body, and He relieves them: (Acts ix, 4, 5:) In his person the church is raised up together, and seated together in heavenly places in Him: (Eph. ii, 6:) And therefore she has her πολιτευμα, "the administration of her public affairs," in heaven. (Phil. iii, 20.) All these properties agree with Christ only: But the Roman Pontiff is not Christ; and therefore he is neither the Head of the church, nor can any affinity be established between Christ, and the Roman Pontiff, which is not signified in the name of some particular member of the body, or of a duty belonging to some member. (Rom. xii, 4–8.) And no greater dignity can belong to the Pope of Rome, under Christ the Head, than that which is comprehended under the words, an apostle, prophet, evangelist, teacher, pastor, bishop, [one who can exercise] the power [of working miracles,] the gift of healing, help, and government. (1 Cor. xii, 4, 6–31.) All these dignities are ascribed to the members of the body of the church: Therefore on account of none of them does the title of "Head" appertain to this Pontiff,

Nichols's note 1. Extrav. de major. et obedientiâ. (Tit. 8.)

Thesis IV

English · Nichols, 1828

IV. The FOUNDATION of the Church Universal is only one, because there is but one house of God and Christ. Its properties are these: It stands by its own power, and does not rest on any extrinsic foundation: (1 Tim. iii, 15:) The whole house, consisting of two people, the Jews and the Gentiles, is built upon this Foundation, as upon a Chief Corner-stone, and is sustained, by the power implanted in it, against all things which can assail it from without, whether from above or from below, on its sides, on the right hand and on the left; it continues immovable, does not totter, is not sunk or overwhelmed, and does not fall: (Heb. iii, 6; Eph. ii, 20–22; Matt. xvi, 18:) This Foundation is the immediate fulcrum or prop and firm support to all the lively stones that are built upon it; "they who believe on Him shall not be ashamed;" but it is a stone of stumbling and a rock of offence to those who do not believe and are disobedient; it dashes them in pieces, and they perish. (Isai. xxviii, 16; 1 Pet. ii, 4–6.) All these properties, both generally and severally, belong to Christ alone: But the Roman Pontiff is not Christ: Therefore neither is he the foundation of the church. But the Metonymy, by which the Prophets and Apostles are called "the foundations of the church," (Rev. xxi, 14,) and by which the saints are said to be "built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets," (Eph. ii, 20,) attributes nothing more to them, than their being "labourers together with God" in laying down Christ as this Foundation, and in building up the whole house on Him. (1 Cor. iii, 5–12:) But St. Peter was also among these; yet he excelled none of the other Apostles in any prerogative, but was inferior to St. Paul, not indeed in power, but in "the more abundant labour" of the latter in building up the church. (1 Cor. xv, 10.)

Thesis V

English · Nichols, 1828

V. God's VICAR-GENERAL, or Universal, is one who administers all things in heaven and on earth in the name, at the command, and by the authority of God. To this individual must necessarily appertain, (1.) A POWER, inferior indeed, by reason of the dispensation, to his who appointed him, yet most closely approaching to it, and dependent on no other power than that of God: (John v, 22, 26, 27:) So that this power may, not undeservedly, be called autocratorical, possessing within itself absolute sovereignty, and pantocratorical, omnipotent or having power over all things. (John xvii, 2, 24.)—(2.) The KNOWDEDGE, as well as the [potentia] CAPABILITY necessary to administer all things: It cannot be less than Divine; for it must be extended to all things generally and to every thing in particular, and this in an immediate manner if we consider the internal efficacy of government. (1 Cor. xv, 27; Rev. ii & iii; Phil. iii, 21; Gal. ii, 20.) And this Vicar of God is only Christ, to whom alone these properties belong: But the Roman Pontiff is not Christ: Therefore he is not God's Universal Vicar, not even in the church, because the same [ratio] considerations apply to her as to the whole universe. In the same way, the Universal Vicar of Christ will be one who pleads the cause of Christ, and who, with a Power and Wisdom purely Divine, administers all things in his name and by his authority. (John i, 6–8, 13–15.) And this is the Spirit of Christ, his Advocate, the Spirit of Wisdom and of the Power of God, who in the name of Christ appoints apostles, prophets, teachers, and bishops; who leads and governs believers, but who convinces and condemns unbelievers. (Acts xx, 28; xiii, 2; Rom. viii, 14.) The Roman Pontiff is not that Spirit, nor hath he received the Spirit without measure. (Rom. xii, 3.) Neither can the Roman Pontiff, even when his conduct is most exemplary, have any other delegated power under Christ, than that which is particular; because he is not endued with the Spirit, except "according to the measure of the gift of Christ:" (Eph. iv, 7:) And this is bestowed [on the Pontiff] not with regard to Christ as a Priest, (for that office does not admit of a Vicar, or Substitute,) but as He is King and Prophet supreme; and only so far as concerns the external administration of some part of Christ's kingdom and people, either by doctrine or by government, the internal administration in the mean time remaining entirely vested in Christ, as does also his Spirit. (1 Cor. iii, 5–23.)

Thesis VI

English · Nichols, 1828

VI. The DOMINION OVER HEAVEN AND EARTH, or over the whole church, (for these cannot be separated,) appertains by Divine gift to Him alone who has said, "All things are delivered unto me of my Father:" (Matt. xi, 27:) "All things which the Father hath, are mine:" (John xvii, 10:) "All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations:" (Matt. xxviii, 18:) "As thou hast given Him power over all flesh, that He should give eternal life to as many as thou hast given Him:" (John xvii, 2:) "Whom God hath set at his own right hand in the heavens, far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this world, but also in that which is to come:" (Ephes. i, 21:) Who is called "the beginning," or the principle, "the first-born from the dead; that in all things He might have the pre-eminence:" (Col. i, 18:) In whom the church is "complete; who is the Head of all principality and power:" (Col. ii, 10:) "On whose vesture and thigh a name is written, KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS." (Rev. xix, 16.) Christ alone is thus described: But the Roman Pontiff is not Christ. The distinction of plenary power, with regard to spirituals and temporals, is contrary both to plenitude of power and to the subordination of things spiritual and temporal; and has been fabricated on account of the defect of the capability of which the Pontiff is destitute, to subject temporal things to himself, even among those nations over whom he has obtained the power in spiritual matters.

Thesis VII

English · Nichols, 1828

VII. THE PRINCE of Bishops, Apostles, Prophets, Evangelists, Pastors, and Teachers, is one: (1 Cor. xii, 4, 5, &c.) If it were otherwise, there would be more than a single monarch and dictator in the Church, when only one is requisite in a monarchical state and government; but then Duumviri, two governors, would hold the pre-eminence. His properties are these: To institute, sanctify, and set apart to the work of the ministry, apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, teachers, and all bishops in the church: (Ephes. iv, 5, 6, 11–13:) To prescribe to them what they must say and do: (Matt. xxviii, 18–20:) To furnish them with necessary and sufficient gifts: (Rom. xii, 3; 2 Cor. iii, 5, 6:) To be present with them, in the power of his Spirit and grace, while engaged in the discharge of their functions: (Matt. xxviii, 20:) To give efficacy to their ministrations: (Mark xvi, 20; 1 Cor. iii, 6:) To compel them to render an account: To make a distinction between the acts and omissions of each; and, according to the different mode of their administrations, to adjudge rewards or punishments. (1 Pet. v, 4; Matt. xxv, 19–30.) And these properties belong to Christ alone: But the Roman Pontiff is not Christ: Therefore he is not the Prince of bishops; but if he have any claim to this office, even when he behaves himself in his best manner, he cannot be called by any other name than that of a Bishop, Pastor, or Teacher, who ought to acknowledge all Bishops as his [sympresbyteris] fellow-priests, without any disparity of the power which belongs to the essence of the office. (1 Pet. v. 1.)

Thesis VIII

English · Nichols, 1828

VIII. Since therefore the Roman Pontiff either attributes these most honourable titles of Christ to himself, or willingly suffers them to be ascribed to him;—and since he evinces no horror at the blasphemy contained in these titles, and gives no tokens of his displeasure at this ascription of them;—it follows, that he puts himself in the place of Christ, and is supremely opposed to Him: There is no excuse in the explanation which is given, that "the head and foundation is ministerial, and that he attributes all these things to himself under Christ, as having been elevated by the grace or favour of God and Christ to that dignity." For the protestation is directly contrary to the fact; and he is so much the more the bitter enemy of God and Christ, as he the more confidently boasts of being defended by the authority of God and Christ. Such conduct is, in fact, under the semblance of friendship to exercise the deepest enmity, and, under the disguised pretext of a minister of light and of righteousness, to promote the interests of the kingdom of darkness and of unrighteousness. On this very account, therefore, we assert, that the disparaging epithets which we laid down in our first Thesis, most justly belong to him; and this we now proceed to shew by descending to particulars.

Thesis IX

English · Nichols, 1828

IX. First. The name of the ADULTERER AND THE PIMP OF THE CHURCH is his.—(1.) He is the ADULTERER of the church, both by the public and mutual profession of each other;—because he calls the [Roman Catholic] Church his "Spouse," and she neither disowns the arrogance of this title nor is afraid of the envy [attached to such assumption;]—and he is the Adulterer in reality: For he practises spiritual adultery with the church, and she in return with him. He commands the apocryphal writings to be accounted divine and canonical; the ancient Latin version of the Scriptures, [commonly called] the Vulgate, to be every where received as [authenticâ] the true original, and under no pretence whatever to be rejected; his own interpretations of the Scriptures to be embraced with the most undoubting faith; and unwritten traditions to be honoured with an affection and reverence equal to that evinced for the written word of God. He enacts and rescinds laws that pertain to faith and morals, and binds them as fetters on consciences. He promises and offers plenary indulgences, and the remission of all sins, through the plenitude of his power. "He exalteth himself above all that is worshipped," and [proponit] offers himself as some God to be adored with religious worship. In all these acts the church, deceived by his artifices, complies with his wishes: He is therefore the ADULTERER of the church. (2.) But he is also the PIMP or PANDER of the church, because he acts towards her as the author, persuader, impelling exciter and procurer of various spiritual adulteries committed, or to be hereafter committed, with different husbands—with angels, Mary and other deceased saints;—with images of God, of Christ, of the Holy Ghost, of the cross, of angels, of Mary, and of Saints;—with the bread in the sacrament of the Lord's Supper; and with other inanimate objects.

Thesis X

English · Nichols, 1828

X. To him likewise belongs the name of THE FALSE PROPHET, whom the Scripture calls "the tail," in opposition to "the head;" (Isai. ix, 15;) and this, whether it be received in a general acceptation, or in a particular sense and restricted to a certain and determinate person. (1.) In its general meaning,—whether it signifies him who teaches falsehood without arrogating to himself the name of a Prophet, or him who falsely boasts of being a prophet; the latter of which seems to be the proper signification of the word. (2 Peter ii, 1; Acts xiii, 6.) For, FIRST, he partly introduced into the church many false dogmas; and partly those which were introduced when such a great mystery of iniquity was finished, he defends, maintains, and propagates: Of this kind the dogmas concerning the insufficiency of the Scriptures without traditions to prove and confirm every necessary truth, and to confute all errors;2 that it is of the last necessity unto salvation for every human creature to be under subjection to the Roman Pontiff; that the bread in the Lord's Supper is transubstantiated, or changed in substance, into the body of Christ; that, in the Mass, Christ is daily offered by the Priest as a propiatory sacrifice for the sins of the living and of the dead; that man is justified before God, partly by faith, and partly by works; that there is a Purgatory, into which the souls of those enter who are not yet sufficiently purified, and that they are released from it, by prayers, [suffragiis,] intercessions, watchings, alms-deeds, indulgences, &c.—In the SECOND sense this epithet is due to him, because he says that he is a prophet, who, on account of the perpetual assistance of the Holy Spirit which is [affixam] attached to that Chair, cannot possibly err in things which pertain to faith and morals. (2.) But it also belongs to him in the restricted meaning of the word; because the Roman Pontiff is "the false prophet who works miracles before the beast;" (Rev xix, 20;) "out of whose mouth comes out three unclean spirits like frogs;" (xvi, 13;) and who is not improperly understood to be "the tail of the great red dragon, that drew the third part of the stars of heaven." (xii, 4.)

Nichols's note 2. Extrav. de Major. et Obedient. Tit. 8.

Thesis XI

English · Nichols, 1828

XI. He is also deservedly called THE DESTROYER AND SUBVERTER OF THE CHURCH. For since the superstructure of the church "is built by the faith of the doctrine of the Apostles and Prophets, which rests on Jesus Christ himself, the Chief Corner-Stone;" since it likewise increases more and more through the obedience of faith in the right worship of the Deity and in the pursuit after holiness; and since it is built up in the Lord, being fitly framed together into one body through the bond of peace and concord; (Ephes. ii, 20, 21; iv, 3; 2 Pet. ii, 5, 6;) the Roman Pontiff demonstrates himself to be, in a four-fold manner, the subverter of this edifice: FIRST, By perverting the faith. This he effects: (1.) By adding the books of the Apocrypha and unwritten traditions to the prophetical and apostolical Scriptures. (2.) By joining himself, as another foundation, with Christ who is the only Foundation. (3.) By mixing numerous false dogmas, with those which are true. (4.) By taking away some things that are true, or corrupting them by false interpretations.—SECONDLY, By adulterating [sinceritatem] the integrity of Divine worship. This he does: (1.) By an addition to the Persons who alone, according to God and his command, are to be objects of worship. (2.) By the introduction of a method which is expressly forbidden by God. (3.) By introducing vain, ridiculous and old wives' superstitions. (4.) By the institution of various peculiar societies of devotees, separate fraternities, and newly fabricated religious orders of Francis, Dominic, &c.—THIRDLY, By vitiating [integritatem] the purity or soundness of holiness and morals. This he accomplishes chiefly by the following acts: (1.) By inventing easy methods of obtaining remission of sins and plenary indulgences. (2.) By [indigitando] declaring certain precepts in the name of Councils. (3.) By absolving many persons from the obligation of their duties. (4.) By binding men to [the performance of] those things, which no one whatever is capable of understanding or accomplishing, (5.) By bringing into the Christian world the worst examples of all wickedness. FOURTHLY, By breaking the bond of concord and unity. This he effects chiefly by these acts and artifices: (1.) When he arrogates to himself a power over others, which by no right belongs to him. (2.) When he obtrudes many false dogmas to be believed as true, and unnecessary things as absolutely necessary. (3.) By excommunications and brute fulminations, by which he madly rages against those who have not deserved such treatment, and who are not subject to his diocese. (4.) When he excites dissensions between princes, republics and magistrates, and their subjects; or when he foments, increases and perpetuates such dissensions, after they have been raised in other quarters.

Thesis XII

English · Nichols, 1828

XII. It is demonstrable by the most evident arguments, that the name of ANTICHRIST and of THE ADVERSARY OF GOD belongs to him. For the apostle ascribes the second of these epithets to him when he calls him "the man of sin, the son of perdition, who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called GOD, or that is worshipped; so that he, as God, sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God." (2 Thess. ii, 3–8.) It was he who should arise out of the ruins of the Roman empire, and should occupy its vacant dignity. These expressions, we assert, must be understood and can be understood solely respecting the Roman Pontiff. But the name of "THE ANTICHRIST" belongs to him pre-eminently,—whether the particle αντι signifies opposition,—or the substitution of one thing for another; not indeed such a substitution as is lawfully and legitimately made by Him who has the power of placing things in subordination, but it signifies such an one as any man places in order himself, or as is done so by another person through force and fraud. For he is both a rival to Christ and his adversary, when he boasts of himself as the spouse, the head, and the foundation of the church, endowed with plenitude of power; and yet he professes himself to be the vice-gerent of Christ and to perform his functions on earth, for the sake of his own private advantage, but to the manifest injury of the church of Christ. He has, however, considered it necessary to employ the name of Christ as a pretext, that under this sacred name he may obtain that reverence for himself among Christians, which he would be unable to procure if he were openly to profess himself to be either the Christ, or the adversary of Christ.

Thesis XIII

English · Nichols, 1828

XIII. Although the Roman Pontiff calls himself "the servant of the servants of God," yet we further assert that he is by way of eminence THAT WICKED AND PERVERSE SERVANT, who, when he saw that his Lord delayed his coming, "began to smite his fellow-servants." (Matt. xxiv, 48.) For the Roman Pontiff has usurped domination and tyranny, not only over his fellow-servants, the Bishops of the church of God, but likewise over Emperors and Kings themselves, whose authority and dignity he had himself previously acknowledged. To acquire this domination for himself, and still further to augment and establish it, he has employed all kinds of Satanic instruments,—sophistical hypocrisy, lies, equivocations, perfidy, perjuries, violence, poison, and armed forces: So that he may most justly be said,—to have succeeded that formidable Beast which "was like unto a leopard, a bear and a lion," and by which the Roman empire [significatum] was prefigured,—and to have "had power to give life unto the image of the Beast, and to cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed."

Thesis XIV

English · Nichols, 1828

XIV. Lastly, Though from all these remarks it will readily appear, that the Roman Pontiff is unworthy of the name of Apostle, Prophet, Evangelist, Pastor, Teacher, and of Universal Bishop; (1 Cor. iii, 5; xii, 28; Ephes. iv, 11;) yet, by this single argument, which is deduced from their peculiar attributes and duties, the very same satisfactory conclusions may be rendered evident to all who search the Scriptures of the Old and the New Testament, and especially the epistles of St. Paul to Timothy and Titus. (1 Tim. iii, Tit. i.) Nor will this evasion avail any thing, "that whatever a man does through another who is his vicar or substitute, he seems to do it himself:" For it is Christ alone who makes use of the vicarious aid of these persons as ministers; and the duties which they perform, are such as ought to be discharged by those who are distinguished by those titles. (Gal. i, 7–9.) Therefore that rightly appertains to the Roman Pontiff which God threatens through the prophet Zechariah, that He will raise up a foolish shepherd, and an idol shepherd who shall devote no attention to the sheep, but who "shall eat the flesh of the fat, and tear their claws in pieces." (Zech. xi, 15–17.) God grant that the church, being delivered from the frauds and tyranny of Antichrist, may obtain shepherds that may feed her in truth, charity and prudence, to the salvation of the sheep themselves, and to the glory of the Chief Shepherd. AMEN.

Corollaries

English · Nichols, 1828

I. It is a part of religious wisdom to separate the Court of Rome from the church in which the Pontiff sits.

II. The Roman Pontiff, even when conducting himself with the greatest propriety, must not be acknowledged by any human or positive right as the head of the church, or the Universal Bishop; and such acknowledgment of him has hitherto contributed, and does in its very nature contribute, not so much to preserve unity in the church, and to restrain the licence of thinking, speaking and teaching differently on the chief articles of religion,—as to take away necessary liberty and that which is agreeable to the word of God, and to introduce a real tyranny.

Transcription notes
  • London 1828 vol. 2, pp. 264–274 (leaves n275–n285), every page checked against the image. The disputation opens below the running head and the close of the previous disputation on p. 264 (the text above the title is not part of this one) and ends on p. 274, where Disputation XXII begins (not included). The Corollaries follow Thesis XIV; the printed word "COROLLARIES.—" that introduces them is represented by the section heading. The two Corollaries keep their printed numerals.
  • Small capitals are written in full capitals: FOR MANY (I); SPOUSE, HUSBAND (II); HEAD (III); FOUNDATION (IV); VICAR-GENERAL, POWER, KNOWDEDGE, CAPABILITY (V); DOMINION OVER HEAVEN AND EARTH, and KING OF KINGS, AND LORD OF LORDS (VI); THE PRINCE (VII); ADULTERER AND THE PIMP OF THE CHURCH, ADULTERER, PIMP, PANDER (IX); THE FALSE PROPHET, FIRST, SECOND (X); THE DESTROYER AND SUBVERTER OF THE CHURCH, FIRST, SECONDLY, THIRDLY, FOURTHLY (XI); ANTICHRIST, THE ADVERSARY OF GOD, THE ANTICHRIST (XII); THAT WICKED AND PERVERSE SERVANT (XIII); AMEN (XIV). "GOD" in the quotation in Thesis XII is printed in ordinary capitals. No small-capital author's name occurs.
  • Greek restored: πολιτευμα (Thesis III, printed with the pi in its variant form and without accents) and αντι (Thesis XII, italic, unaccented). CCEL prints the first as "woliteuma" and the second as "anti".
  • Bracketed Latin glosses kept and italicised: [ornant sed onerant] (I), [singularissima], [propinquitas] (II), [potentia], [ratio] (V), [sympresbyteris] (VII), [authenticâ], [proponit] (IX), [suffragiis,], [affixam] (X), [indigitando] (XI), [significatum] (XIII). Two are printed in roman type, not italic, and are kept so: [sinceritatem] and [integritatem] (XI). English editorial brackets ([and their successors], [one who can exercise], [of working miracles,], [on the Pontiff], [Roman Catholic], [commonly called], [attached to such assumption;], [the performance of]) are roman in print. CCEL drops all the Latin brackets, including [potentia] CAPABILITY, which it reads simply as "Power".
  • Where CCEL differs materially from London (London followed, each checked on the image): CCEL reads "Power" for London's "[potentia] CAPABILITY" (V); "fellow elders" for "[sympresbyteris] fellow-priests" (VII); "the odium" for "the envy" (IX); "some god" for "some God" (IX); "senseless fulminations" for "brute fulminations" (XI); "one by which any man is substituted, either by himself or by another person" for "such an one as any man places in order himself, or as is done so by another person" (XII); "perjury" for "perjuries" (XIII). CCEL ends Thesis I "to Him through his just deserts, which we now proceed" for London's "to him through his just deserts: Which we now proceed". It writes "propitiatory" where London prints "propiatory" (X), "Rev. 2 and 3" for "Rev. ii & iii" (V), "Matt. 24, 48" for "Matt. xxiv, 48" (XIII) and "(1 Tim. 3; Tit. 1.)" for "(1 Tim. iii, Tit. i.)" (XIV), and reads "Isa." for London's "Isai." (IV, X). It drops Nichols's italics in I, V (autocratorical, pantocratorical), VI, VII (Duumviri), IX–XII, XIV, and both footnotes. It omits the closing quotation mark after "the beast;" (X) and the opening quotation mark before "the beginning," (VI), and misprints "mirades" for "miracles" (III) and "digaity" for "dignity" (XII).
  • Misprints and oddities kept as printed: "II:" for "II." at the head of Thesis II; "KNOWDEDGE" (V, for Knowledge); "propiatory" (X); "1 Cor. xv, 27; Rev. ii & iii" (V, a semicolon after the numeral); "(1 Pet. v. 1.)" and "(1 Tim. iii, Tit. i.)" (VII, XIV); "Rev xix, 20" without a full stop after "Rev" (X); a comma after "Pontiff" at the end of Thesis III where a full stop would be expected; "shew", "any thing", "every where", "vice-gerent", "old wives'" as in print;. The printed comma after "accomplishing," at the end of the fourth item under THIRDLY (XI) is kept, where a full stop would be expected.
  • The OCR misread many references, all settled on the image: "Phil. i, 20" (OCR) is "Phil. iii, 20" (III); "Isai. xxvii, 16" is "xxviii, 16" (IV); "xvi, 18" is "xvi, 13" (X); "Rev. xxu, 17" is "xxii, 17" (II); "Eph. 11, 20" and similar are "ii". "Duewmviri" (OCR) is Duumviri; "Sprouse" and "Huszanp" (OCR) are SPOUSE and HUSBAND; the "*" after "when" in VII (OCR) is a speck in the paper, not a mark.
  • Footnote 1 (Thesis III, mark * after "monster.") sits at the foot of p. 265; footnote 2 (Thesis X, mark * after "all errors;") sits at the foot of p. 270. Both are in roman type: note 1 reads "obedientiâ" with a circumflex, and note 2 reads "Obedient. Tit. 8." with the abbreviation as printed.