← All disputations

Disputation XV

On Divine Predestination

English only, for now. The translation is James Nichols’s (London, 1828), printed from his edition and checked against its pages. Arminius’s Latin, from the 1629 Opera, is still to be set beside it.
PresidingJacobus Arminius
RespondentWilliam Bastingius
English printed fromJames Nichols, The Works of James Arminius, vol. 2 (London: Longman, 1828), pp. 226–230
Headnote

Occasion. The fifteenth of the twenty-five Public Disputations printed in the Opera and in Nichols's English, defended under Arminius by the respondent whom Nichols prints as William Bastingius. It follows the disputation on the offices of our Lord Jesus Christ and precedes the disputation on the vocation of men to salvation. The Leiden library holds a 1604 printing of it (236 A 9: 99).

The doctrinal move. Thesis I takes the term Predestination, in Greek Προορισμον, first in a general sense as God's decree for the governance of all things (Providence), then in a stricter sense as regarding rational creatures to be saved or damned, and settles on the last sense in which Scripture almost constantly uses it: the election of men, with Reprobation as its opposite. Thesis II defines it as the decree of God's good pleasure in Christ to justify, adopt and endow with everlasting life believers on whom He had decreed to bestow faith. The theses then run through its parts in order: the genus, a decree that is evangelical and not legal (III); its cause, God's good pleasure, which excludes anything in man that could move God either way (IV); its foundation, Jesus Christ (V); its eternity (VI); its matter, divine things and persons, the persons being believers (VII); its form (VIII); and its end, the praise of the glory of God's grace (IX). Thesis X says that this Decree is according to Election, which necessarily infers Reprobation, and Theses XI–XII define Reprobation as a decree of God's wrath against unbelievers who by their own fault would not believe, and set out what the reprobate will endure. Thesis XIII says that each decree has its Execution, performed in the order appointed in the decree, with the same objects. Thesis XIV lists the use of the doctrine under four heads: it establishes the glory of God's grace, consoles afflicted consciences, terrifies the wicked and drives away their security. Thesis XV says that the doctrine ought to resound in the Church and that nothing be taught concerning it beyond what the Scriptures say, in the manner and to the end that they propose. A quotation from Ecclesiasticus is printed after it.

Thesis I

English · Nichols, 1828

I. WE call this decree “PREDESTINATION;” in Greek, Προορισμον, from the verb Προοριζειν, which signifies to determine, appoint, or decree any thing before you enter on its execution. According to this general notion, Predestination, when attributed to God, will be his Decree for the governance of all things, to which Divines usually give the appellation of PROVIDENCE. (Acts ii, 28; xvii, 26.) It is customary to consider it in a less general notion, so far as it has reference to rational creatures who are to be saved or damned, for instance, angels and men. It is taken in a stricter sense about the Predestination of men, and then it is usually employed in two ways: For it is sometimes accommodated to both the Elect and the Reprobate: At other times, it is restricted to the Elect alone, and then it has Reprobation as its opposite. According to this last signification, in which it is almost constantly used in Scripture, (Rom. viii, 29,) we will treat on Predestination.

Thesis II

English · Nichols, 1828

II. Predestination therefore, as it regards the thing itself, is the Decree of the good pleasure of God in Christ, by which He resolved within himself from all eternity, to justify, adopt, and endow with everlasting life, to the praise of his own glorious grace, believers on whom He had decreed to bestow faith. (Eph. i; Rom. ix.)

Thesis III

English · Nichols, 1828

III. The genus of Predestination we lay down as a Decree, which is called in Scripture Προθεσις, “the purpose of God,” (Rom. ix, 11,) and Βουλην του θεληματος Θεου, “the counsel of God’s own will:” (Eph. i, 11:) And this Decree is not legal, according to what is said, “The man who doeth those things shall live by them;” (Rom. x, 5;) but it is evangelical, and this is the language which it holds: “This is the will of God, that every one who seeth the Son, and believeth on him, may have everlasting life.” (John vi, 40; Rom. x, 9.) This Decree therefore is peremptory and irrevocable; because the [extrema] final manifestation of “the whole counsel of God” concerning our salvation, is contained in the Gospel. (Acts xx, 27; Heb. i, 2; ii, 2, 3.)

Thesis IV

English · Nichols, 1828

IV. The Cause of this Decree is God, “according to the good pleasure,” or the benevolent affection, “of his own will.” (Eph. i, 5.) And God indeed is the Cause, as possessing the right of determining as He wills both about men as his creatures, and especially as sinners, and about his blessings, (Jer. xviii, 6; Matt. xx, 14, 15,) “according to the good pleasure of his own will,” by which being moved with and in himself he made that decree. This “good pleasure” not only excludes every cause which it could take from man, or which it could be imagined to take from him; but it likewise removes whatever was in or from man, that could justly move God not to make that gracious Decree. (Rom. xi, 34, 35.)

Thesis V

English · Nichols, 1828

V. As the Foundation of this Decree we place Jesus Christ, the Mediator between God and men, (Eph. i, 4,) “in whom the Father is well pleased;” (Matt. iii, 17; Luke iii, 22;) “in whom God reconciled the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;” and “whom God made to be sin for us, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him.” (2 Cor. v, 19, 21.) Through Him “everlasting righteousness was to be brought in,” (Dan. ix, 24,) adoption to be acquired, the Spirit of grace and of faith was to be obtained, (Gal. iv, 5, 19, 6,) eternal life procured, (John vi, 51,) and all the plenitude of spiritual blessings prepared, the communication of which must be decreed by Predestination. He is also constituted by God the Head of all those persons who will by Divine Predestination accept of [communionem] the equal enjoyment of these blessings. (Eph. i, 22; v, 23; Heb. v, 9.)

Thesis VI

English · Nichols, 1828

VI. We attribute Eternity to this Decree; because God does nothing in time, which He has not decreed to do from all eternity. For “known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world:” (Acts xv, 18:) and “He hath chosen us in Christ before the foundation of the world.” (Eph. i, 4.) If it were otherwise, God might be charged with mutability.

Thesis VII

English · Nichols, 1828

VII. We say that the Object or Matter of Predestination is two-fold—Divine Things, and Persons to whom the communication of those Divine Things has been predestinated by this decree. (1.) These DIVINE THINGS receive from the Apostle the general appellation of “spiritual blessings:” (Eph. i, 3:) Such are, in the present life, Justification, Adoption as sons, (Rom. viii, 29. 30,) and the Spirit of grace and adoption. (Eph. i, 5; John i, 12; Gal. iv, 6, 7.) Lastly, after this life, Eternal Life. (John iii, 15, 16.) The whole of these things are usually comprised and enunciated, in the Divinity Schools, by the names of GRACE and GLORY.—(2.) We circumscribe the PERSONS within the limits of the word “Believers,” which presupposes sin: For no one believes on Christ except a sinner, and the man who acknowledges himself to be that sinner. (Matt. ix, 13; xi, 28.) Therefore, the plenitude of those blessings, and the preparation of them which has been made in Christ, were necessary for none but sinners. But we give the name of “Believers,” not to those who would be such by their own merits or strength, but to those who by the gratuitous and peculiar kindness of God [erant credituri] would believe in Christ. (Rom. ix, 32; Gal. ii, 20; Matt. xi, 25; xiii, 11; John vi, 44; Phil. i, 29.)

Thesis VIII

English · Nichols, 1828

VIII. The Form is the decreed communication itself of these blessings to believers, and in the mind of God the pre-existent and pre-ordained relation and ordination of believers to Christ their Head: The fruit of which they receive through a real and actual union with Christ their Head. In the present life, this fruit is gracious, through the commencement and increase of the union; and in the life to come, it is glorious, through the complete consummation of this union. (2 Tim. i, 9, 10; John i, 16, 17; xvii, 11, 12, 22–24; Eph. iv, 13, 15.)

Thesis IX

English · Nichols, 1828

IX. The End of Predestination is the praise of the glorious grace of God: For since grace, or the gratuitous love of God in Christ, is the Cause of Predestination, it is equitable that to the same grace the entire glory of this act should be ceded. (Eph. i, 6; Rom. xi, 36.)

Thesis X

English · Nichols, 1828

X. But this Decree of Predestination is “according to Election,” as the Apostle says: (Rom. ix, 6, 11:) This Election necessarily infers Reprobation. Reprobation therefore is opposed to Predestination, as its contrary; and is likewise called “a casting away,” (Rom. xi, 1,) “an ordination to condemnation,” (Jude 4,) and “an appointment unto wrath.” (1 Thess. v, 9.)

Thesis XI

English · Nichols, 1828

XI. From the law of contraries, we define Reprobation to be a Decree of the Wrath, or of the Severe Will, of God; by which He resolved from all eternity to condemn to eternal death unbelievers who, by their own fault and the just judgment of God, would not believe, for the declaration of his Wrath and Power. (John iii, 18; Luke vii, 30; John xii, 37–40; 2 Thess. ii, 10, 11; Rom. ix, 22.)

Thesis XII

English · Nichols, 1828

XII. Though by faith in Jesus Christ the remission of all sins is obtained, and sins are not imputed to them who believe; (Rom. iv, 2–11;) yet the Reprobate will be compelled to endure the punishment, not only of their unbelief, (by the contrary of which they might avoid the chastisement due to the rest of their sins,) but likewise of the sins which they have committed against the law, being “everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power.” (John viii, 24; ix, 41; 2 Thess. i, 9.)

Thesis XIII

English · Nichols, 1828

XIII. To each of these Decrees, that of Predestination and that of Reprobation, is subjoined its Execution; the acts of which are performed in that order in which they have been appointed in and by the Decree itself; and the objects both of the Decree and of its Execution are the same, and entirely uniform, or invested with the same formal relation.1 (Psalm cxv, 3; xxxiii, 9, 11.)

Nichols's note 1. I have almost uniformly translated formalis ratio, as it now stands in the text. Occasionally, however, I have followed Bishop Stillingfleet's practice, and rendered it “formal reason.” See the remarks which occur in page 79.

Thesis XIV

English · Nichols, 1828

XIV. Great is the Use of this doctrine, as thus delivered from the Scriptures. For it serves to establish the glory of the grace of God, to console afflicted consciences, to terrify the wicked and to drive away their security. (1.) But it establishes the grace of God, when it ascribes the whole praise of our Vocation, Justification, Adoption, and Glorification, to the Mercy of God alone, and takes it entirely away from our own strength, works, and merits. (Rom. viii, 29, 30; Ephes. i.)—(2.) It comforts afflicted consciences that are struggling with temptation, when it renders them assured of the gracious [benevolentia] good-will of God in Christ, which was from all eternity decreed to them, performed in time, and which will endure for ever. (Isai. liv, 8.) It also shews, that the purpose of God according to election stands firm, not of works, but of Him that calleth. (1 Cor. i, 9; Rom. ix, 11.)—(3.) It is capable of terrifying the ungodly; because it teaches, that the Decree of God concerning unbelievers is irrevocable; (Heb. iii, 11, 17–19;) and that “they who do not obey the truth, but believe a lie,” are to be adjudged to eternal destruction. (2 Thess. ii, 12.)

Thesis XV

English · Nichols, 1828

XV. This doctrine therefore ought to resound, not only within private walls and in Schools, but also in the assemblies of the Saints and in the Church of God. Yet one caution ought to be strictly observed, that nothing be taught concerning it beyond what the Scriptures say, that it be propounded in the manner which the Scriptures have adopted, and that it be referred to the same end as that which the Scriptures propose when they deliver it. This, by the gracious assistance of God, we think, we have done: “Unto Him be glory in the church by Christ Jesus throughout all ages, world without end. AMEN!”

Appended Quotations

English · Nichols, 1828

“The Power of God is great, but it obtains glory from the humble. Do not inconsiderately seek out the things that are too hard for thee; neither foolishly search for things which surpass thy powers. But meditate with reverence upon those things which God has commanded thee: For it is not requisite for thee to see with thine eyes those things which are secret. Do not curiously handle those matters which are unprofitable and unnecessary to thy discourse: For more things are shewn unto thee, than the human understanding can comprehend.”—Ecclesiasticus iii, 20–23.

Transcription notes
  • London 1828 vol. 2, pp. 226–230 (leaves n237–n241), every page checked against the image. The disputation ends near the foot of p. 229; the Ecclesiasticus quotation runs over to the top of p. 230, above the heading of Disputation XVI, which is not included.
  • Greek restored from the page image: Προορισμον and Προοριζειν (Thesis I) and Προθεσις (Thesis III), all printed without accents or breathings; Βουλην του θεληματος Θεου (Thesis III), where the print shows the old contracted ου ligature (a figure like an 8) in Βουλην, του and Θεου, written here as ου, and again without accents. The OCR garbled the whole of it (“Beayy re beAnwaros Ocs”).
  • Bracketed Latin glosses kept and italicised: [extrema] (III), [communionem] (V), [erant credituri] (VII, broken across a line-end in print), [benevolentia] (XIV). The OCR mis-scanned some of the brackets (“| benevolentia]”).
  • Small capitals written in full capitals: WE, PREDESTINATION, PROVIDENCE (I), DIVINE THINGS, GRACE, GLORY, PERSONS (VII), AMEN (XV). Italics restored in Theses I, III, VII, VIII and the closing Ecclesiasticus.
  • Nichols's reference punctuation is kept: “Rom. viii, 29. 30” (VII) has a full stop in print; “(Rom. ix, 6, 11:)” and “(Eph. i, 11:)” have the colon inside the bracket; “Ephes. i.)—(2.)” (XIV) is as printed. The dashes in “22–24”, “37–40”, “2–11” and “17–19” are en dashes here.
  • OCR Scripture numerals misread and corrected from the image: “Rom. vii, 29” for viii, 29 (I and XIV); “Luke i, 22” for iii, 22 (V); “John i, 15, 16” for iii, 15, 16 (VII); “Matt. x1, 28” for xi, 28; “Ecclesiasticus ii, 20–23” for iii, 20–23. The OCR's “Psalm ecxy, 3” is Psalm cxv, 3; “Heb. 11; 2ac3” is Heb. i, 2; ii, 2, 3.
  • Nichols's footnote (XIII) refers to “page 79”, as printed; that is a page of another part of his volume, not of this disputation. CCEL drops Nichols's bracketed glosses, the footnote, and the small-capital emphasis, and re-forms the Scripture references; London was followed throughout. No misprint requiring a note was found.